THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Sean D. Nelson,        Appellant,

Appeal From Charleston County
Daniel F. Pieper, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.� 2003-UP-562
Submitted July 15, 2003 � Filed September 29, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:� Sean D. Nelson appeals his conviction for armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime.� Nelson argues the trial court erred in refusing to include a specific jury charge regarding the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy of identification.� In a separate pro se brief, Nelson argues that the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress in-court and out-of-court identifications, which Nelson claims were unduly suggestive and conducive of irreparable mistake.� Nelson�s counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.� After a thorough review of the record and counsel�s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Nelson�s appeal and grant counsel�s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.