THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Reginald Montgomery, Appellant.

Appeal From Orangeburg County
�J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-134
Submitted March 2, 2009 � Filed March 9, 2009�

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Reginald Montgomery appeals his conviction and twenty-two year sentence for armed robbery.� Montgomery argues the trial court erred by admitting photographic lineup evidence.� Additionally, Montgomery asserts numerous pro se arguments.� After a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel�s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.