THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
William Dale Neely, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
John W. Kittredge, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-067
Submitted November 19, 2003 – Filed
February 11, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: William Dale Neely appeals his guilty pleas and sentences for burglary, grand larceny, and petit larceny. Counsel for Neely attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Neely did not file a separate pro se response.
After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Neely’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.