THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Rhonda Michelle Mintz, Appellant.

Appeal From Chesterfield County
 Kenneth G. Goode, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-517
Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed December 1, 2010     

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Rhonda Michelle Mintz appeals her probation revocation, arguing the probation revocation hearing was too summary in nature.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),  and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.