THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Amy E. R., Gilbert R., and Angus C., Defendants,

Of whom Amy E. R. is the, Appellant.

In the interest of three minor children under the age of 18.


Appeal From Greenville County
Robert N. Jenkins, Sr., Family Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-053
Submitted January 3, 2012 – Filed January 26, 2012


AFFIRMED


Jonathan Ashley Neal and Thomas J. Quinn, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Deborah  Murdock, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Amy E. R. appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

FEW, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.