Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant. John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Appellant pled guilty to distribution of crack cocaine in July 1999 and was sentenced to four years confinement. Upon serving 85 percent of his sentence he was released into the Community Supervision Program (CSP), required of all Class A, B or C felons. Appellant's CSP was revoked for a second time in July 2005 and he was sentenced to one year confinement. Appellanlt contests his CSP revocation claiming he should never have been placed into the CSP program. Appellant asserts he was charged, convicted and sentenced as a Class D felon which did not require him to be placed into CSP.

D. Reece Williams, III, and Louis H. Lang, of Columbia, for Appellants-Respondents. E. Crosby Lewis and Raymon E. Lark, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondents-Appellants.

Thomas O'Neal and others appeal from the order in which the trial court refused to set aside a deed into Unita Pearson and held O'Neal's claims were barred by laches.

Gregory Samuel Forman, of Charleston, for Appellant. David Dusty Rhoades, of Charleston, and Cynthia Barrier Patterson, of Columbia, for Respondent.

In this domestic action, Husband claims the court erred in granting a divorce on grounds of adultery because inclination to commit adultery was not proven at trial. Husband also alleges the court erred in many of its rulings concerning the equitable distribution of marital assets.

Marie T. Assaad Faltas, of Columbia, pro se Appellant. Dana M. Thye, of Columbia, for Respondent.

The circuit court reversed the municipal court's grant of Assa'ad-Faltas's motion for a new trial on a prior shoplifting conviction and Assa'ad-Faltas appeals arguing: (1) the City was constitutionally barred from appealing the order granting her a new trial based on after-discovered evidence; (2) the City waived all grounds for appeal; (3) the circuit court failed to properly follow procedural and substantive precedent.

Tara Shurling, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Senior Assistant Attorney General Harold M. Coombs, Jr., of Columbia, and Solicitor John R. Justice, of Chester, for Respondent.

The defendant alleges the trial court erred in allowing certain testimony to be entered into the trial, which resulted in his conviction.

The following two cases will be heard jointly:

Grahame E. Holmes and Bert G. Utsey, III, of Walterboro, for Appellants. John E. North, Jr., of Beaufort, for Respondents.

Bert Glenn Utsey, III, of Walterboro, for Appellants. John E. North, Jr., of Beaufort, for Respondents.

These combined appeals arise from litigation involving Defendants' purchase of a restaurant from Plaintiffs. At issue in these appeals are (1) the grant of summary judgment to Defendants on Plaintiffs' contractual causes of action; (2) the trial court's refusal to conduct oral argument on Plaintiffs' motion to alter or amend and its failure to request a brief from Plaintiffs in light of this refusal; (3) the grant of summary judgment to Defendants on Plaintiffs' claim for defamation; and (4) the award of attorney fees and costs to Defendants.

Donald Bruce Clark, of Charleston, and Mark O. Andrews, of Mt. Pleasant, for Appellant. Desa A. Ballard, of West Columbia; John S. Nichols, of Columbia; Susan T. Kinard and W. Robert Kinard, of Mt. Pleasant, for Respondent.

John J. McCrosson appeals: (1) the family court's failure to award sole custody to husband; (2) the family court's findings of fact concerning wife; (3) the family court's findings of fact concerning husband; (4) the family court's award of child support to wife; (5) the family court's division of the marital estate; and (6) the family court's award of $100,000 in attorneys fees to wife.

E. Ros Huff Jr., Esq. of Irmo for Appellant. Grady Larry Beard, Esq. of Columbia for Respondents.

In this workers’ compensation case, the Appellant contends the Circuit Court erred: (1) as a matter of law in failing to issue more than a form order; and (2) as a matter of law in affirming the finding of the Appellate Panel that the claimant was NOT an employee of Labor Depot.

J. Kendall Few, of Greer, and Thomas E Hite, Jr., of Abbeville, for Appellants-Respondents. George P. Callison, Jr. of Greenwood, for Respondent-Appellant.

In this condemnation action, Eldridge appeals the special referee's holding that the subject property was not contiguous or appurtenant to the land of the property owner's class, holding that county zoning regulations prohibited placing free standing signs on the subject property, and finding that certain tracts of the subject property had no value for compensation purposes. SCDOT appeals the special referee's valuation of certain tracts of the subject property.

G. Dana Sinkler, of Charleston, for Appellant. Frank M. Cisa, of Mt. Pleasant, for Respondent.

Questions whether prejudgment interest was appropriately awarded under the facts of the case.