William Stevens Brown, of Greenville, for Appellant. Robert M. Holland and James C. Cothran, Jr., of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

Taylor brought this action against Bank of America to redeem a certificate of deposit that Bank of America claims had been previously redeemed or canceled. The trial court ruled in favor of Taylor, and Bank of America appeals, arguing the trial court erred in failing to find the statute of limitations barred the suit and in unfairly shifting the burden of proof to the defendant.

William T. Toal, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Shawn L. Reeves, of Columbia, and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Appellant appeals from his conviction for assault and battery with intent to kill, arguing the trial court (1) improperly denied cross-examination; (2) erroneously admitted speculative evidence; and (3) improperly admonished defense counsel, violating appellant's right to a fair trial.

Symmes Watkins Culbertson, of Greenville, for Appellant. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Senior Assistant Attorney General Harold M. Coombs, Jr., of Columbia, and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

In this appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial, the court analyzes whether the State violated the mandates of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), in failing to turn over certain documents in the defendant's murder trial.

Melissa Jane Reed Kimbrough and Alexandre Thomas Postic, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, of Columbia, and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Requests the court to determine whether evidence submitted at trial should have been suppressed because of a defective search warrant, and whether a jury charge was adequate.

Richard H. Rhodes, of Spartanburg, for Appellant. Kenneth C. Porter and David Alan Wilson, of Greenville, for Respondent.

In this domestic relations action, Husband appeals the family court's order, arguing the judge erred in: (1) equitably dividing the marital property; (2) ordering Husband to pay alimony in the amount of $1,200 per month; (3) awarding Wife expert witness fees; and (4) holding that a certain business constituted marital property.

R. Bentz Kirby and Glenn Walters, of Orangeburg, for Appellants. Allen D. Smith, of Columbia, for Respondent.

This case questions whether the pleadings constitute an appeal of a short-term suspension imposed by the Board of Education, thereby depriving the circuit court of subject matter jurisdiction.

Marian D. Nettles, of Lake City, and James M. Saleeby, Sr., of Florence, for Appellant-Respondent. Cheryl Turner Hopkins, of Florence, and Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald, of Charleston, for Respondent-Appellant.

In this cross appeal, Wife argues the family court abused its discretion in (1) denying her alimony, (2)awarding her only 37.5% of the marital estate, (3) including certain items in the marital estate, and (4) denying her request for attorney's fee. In Husband's appeal, he argues the family court erred in identifying and valuing the marital estate.

Kirsten Leslie Barr, of Mt. Pleasant, for Appellant. Ben C. Harrison, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

In this workers' compensation action, the employer appeals the order of the South Carolina Workers' Compensation Commission awarding claimant benefits and finding the employer was not entitled to credit for payment of temporary total disability payments as of the date claimant reached maximum medical improvement.

Regina H. Lewis and James C. Leventis, Jr., of Columbia, for Appellant. Paul Winford Owen, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent.

Churpeyes, Inc. challenges the circuit court's denial of its motion for directed verdict on Guider's claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Churpeyes also challenges the circuit court's admission of the testimony of a former co-worker of Guider. Churpeyes next contends the circuit court erred in charging the jury on the elements of breach of trust with fraudulent intent and in allowing the issue of punitive damages to be submitted to the jury.

Ralph Shealy Kennedy, Jr, and Robert M.Cook II, of Batesburg-Leesville, for Appellant. Thomas J. Keaveny, II, of Charleston, and Bob J. Conley, of Charleston, for Respondent.

In this John Doe proceeding, Appellant avers the circuit judge erred in dismissing the Appellant's complaint for failure to comply with S.C. Code Ann. Section 38-77-170 (2002)

Desa A. Ballard, of West Columbia, for Appellants. James C. Parham, Jr., and Patricia S. Ravenhorst, of Greenville, for Respondent.

Appellants argue that the circuit court erred in awarding attorney's fees to Respondent, or in the alternative, that the amount of fees awarded was unreasonable.

Assistant Appellate Defenders Robert M. Dudek and Katherine Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, and Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey A. Jacobs, of Columbia, and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

In this murder case, Appellant posits a plethora of issues: (1) the court erred by refusing to allow cross examination of alleged accomplices about their sentencing exposure for murder and other charges; (2) the court erred in allowing testimony in regard to alleged bad acts; (3) the court erred by allowing the Solicitor to elicit testimony that Appellant was in jail at the time of trial; and (4) the court erred in the jury charge in regard to the principle of the hand of one, hand of all doctrine.