Joseph Dawson, III, of North Charleston, for Appellant. Richard Alexander Murdaugh and Austin Howell Crosby, both of Peters Murdaugh Parker Eltzroth & Detrick, PA, of Hampton, for Respondent. Bert Glenn Utsey, III, of Peters Murdaugh Parker Eltzroth & Detrick, PA, of Walterboro, for Respondent.

In this action Charles Gary (Appellant) asserts the circuit court erred in determining he was not Blondell Gary's husband at the time of her death and not an heir to her estate. Appellant asserts the estate should be estopped from taking a position contradictory to its pleadings in previous cases.

Michael J. Anzelmo of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Columbia, for Appellant. Alice F. Paylor of Rosen Rosen & Hagood, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondents.

In this foreclosure action, Bank appeals the circuit court's grant of summary judgment to Property Owner, arguing the circuit court erred in finding Bank was prohibited from foreclosing on the property due to unclean hands.

Bradley Lewis Lanford and Jon B. Asbill, both of Baker Ravenel & Bender, LLP, of Columbia, for Appellant. William Peele Early of Pierce, Herns, Sloan & Wilson, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent Medical University of South Carolina. Stephen Lynwood Brown, Donald Jay Davis, Jr., Russell Grainger Hines, and James Edward Scott, IV, all of Young Clement Rivers, of Charleston, for Respondent John Roberts, M.D.

In this action Clair Craver Johnson appeals the circuit court's entry of summary judgment in favor of John Roberts, M.D. and the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) (collectively Respondents). Johnson asserts the circuit court erred in finding her claims were time barred by the statute of repose applicable to medical malpractice claims.

Temus C. Miles, Jr. of McKay Cauthen Settana & Stubley, PA, of Columbia, for Appellants. Zandra L. Johnson of The Z Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Respondent.

In this workers' compensation case, the University of South Carolina Apprentice Students and State Accident Fund appeal the order of the Appellate Panel allowing Faubert to combine wages to calculate his average weekly wage.

Sarah Day Hurley of Turner Padget Graham & Laney, PA, of Greenville, for Appellant. Adam Crittenden Bach and Robert Hudson Smith, both of Eller Tonnsen Bach, of Greenville, for Respondent.

Innegrity, LLC (Innegrity), appeals the trial court's denial of Innegrity's Rule 60(b), SCRCP, motion for new trial. This court granted Innegrity's request to motion the trial court for a new trial while Innegrity's original appeal was pending. In that initial appeal, Innegrity argues the trial court erred by (1) excluding portions of Respondent Brian Morin's deposition; (2) denying Innegrity's motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict (JNOV) due to (a) impossibility, (b) the erroneous award of "back pay" to Morin, (c) equitable estoppel, and (d) a speculative damages award; and (3) awarding Morin treble damages.

M. Dawes Cooke, Jr. and Phillip S. Ferderigos, both of Barnwell Whaley Patterson & Helms, LLC, of Charleston, for Appellant. Martin S. Driggers, Sr., of Driggers & Moyd, of Hartsville, for Respondent.

Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (Travelers) appeals the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Ard Trucking Company (Ard Trucking), arguing the court erred in finding a Loss Sensitive Rate Plan (LSRP) did not apply to the insurance policy issued by Travelers to Ard Trucking because (1) Ard Trucking agreed to be bound by a Workers' Compensation Insurance Plan, which required the LSRP to apply to Ard Trucking's assigned risk policy; (2) Ard Trucking, through its producer, had knowledge the LSRP applied to its policy; and (3) the circuit court's prejudgment interest award was in error.

Miller W. Shealy, Jr. of Miller Shealy Law Firm, of Charleston, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Vann Henry Gunter, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. Solicitor David Matthew Stumbo, of Greenwood, for Respondent.

Appellant Brad Bernard Dawkins appeals his convictions for lewd act upon a minor and criminal sexual conduct with a minor, arguing the trial court erred by (1) refusing to charge the jury on the lesser-included offense of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, (2) refusing to grant his motion for a directed verdict based on the State's failure to establish the county in which the alleged offenses occurred, and (3) allowing the State to present improper comments during its closing argument.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Appellant. Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Appellant. Edward L. Phipps of Phipps Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.

The State of South Carolina appeals the circuit court's order affirming the magistrate court's dismissal of Tami Baker Sisler's charges for driving under the influence (DUI) and child endangerment, arguing the magistrate court erred in dismissing the charges based on its finding there was no probable cause for a traffic stop. Specifically, the State asserts (1) the magistrate court improperly considered Deputy Chris Haire's subjective intentions rather than the objective totality of the circumstances; (2) Deputy Haire had probable cause to stop Sisler based on the fact she crossed the center lane line; and (3) if Deputy Haire did not conduct a traffic stop, no reasonable person would have felt this encounter constituted a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.