Michael A. Molony and Lea B. Kerrison, of Charleston, for Appellant. Leslie S. Riley and Evander Whitehead, of North Charleston, for Respondent SCDHEC Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management. Andrew K. Epting, Jr., and Clayton B. McCullough, of Charleston, for Respondent Don H. Brown.

Neal appeals from the circuit court's order affirming the Appellate Panel's decision to reverse the issuance of a dock permit to Neal, arguing: (1) the circuit court erred in affirming the decision; and (2) the circuit court applied the wrong scope of review.

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Shawn L. Reeves, of Columbia, and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

In this criminal action, the court determines whether the trial court erred in denying appellant's motion for a directed verdict on the charge of accessory before the fact to criminal sexual conduct with a minor due to insufficient evidence.

Darryl D. Smalls, of Columbia, for Appellants. Thomas W. Greene, of Charleston, for Respondent.

In this Workers' Compensation case, appellants allege error on the part of the Circuit Court in affirming the Commission's conclusion that the Employer/Carrier is responsible for the medical treatment provided by Drs. Wingate, Vial, Khoury and any other physicians with reference to the Claimant's back injury, brachial plexopathy, and collapsed diaphragm. The Claimant responds that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the decision of the Commission because: (a) the treatment sought by the Claimant was required due to the deterioration of Claimant's spine and his intractable pain; (b) the treatment received by Claimant was necessary and gave "relief" and tended to "lessen the period of disability."

Holly Saleeby Atkins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Jason W. Lockhart, of Columbia, for Respondents.

In this workers' compensation case, the claimant argues the Workers' Compensation Commission erred as a matter of law in finding his claim for injuries to his neck and back were not compensable.

M. M. Weinberg, Jr., of Sumter, for Appellant. Thomas E. Player, Jr., of Sumter, for Respondent.

In this breach of contract case, Enon Missionary Baptist Church claims the circuit court erred by failing to find the construction contract gave the church a right to require a performance and payment bond and in failing to find Neal's failure to provide said bonds was a material breach.

William Gary White, III, of Columbia, for Appellant. William H. Davidson II, of Columbia, for Respondent.

In this negligence action, Huggins claims the circuit courts erred in finding federal and state claims in this matter were identical and in finding the federal court's ruling was dispositive of state claim issues.

James S. Gibson, Jr. and Mary B. Lohr, of Beaufort, and William L. Howard, Sr., of Charleston, for Appellants. Robert V. Mathison, Jr. of Hilton Head Island, for Respondents.

In this action revolving around the dissolution of a pediatric care partnership, Lowcountry Pediatrics appeals from the trial court's valuation of the partnership. Lowcountry Pediatrics argues the trial court erred in: (1) including the value of the individual physicians in its calculation of fair market value, (2) awarding prejudgment interest, and (3) ordering the payment of punitive damages.

Evander Whitehead, of Charleston; Jacquelyn Sue Dickman and Carlisle Roberts, Jr., of Columbia; for Appellant. Mary D. Shahid and Lucas C. Padgett, Jr., of Charleston, for Respondents; Frank Paul Calamita, III, of Richmond, VA, for Respondents.

This case involves National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits DHEC issued to respondents. On appeal before this court, DHEC argues the circuit court erred in (1) finding respondents preserved certain issues for appeal; (2) reversing the DHEC Board's application of the "0.1 Rule" under section 48-1-83 of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2005) and title 25, regulation 61-68(D)(4) of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2005); (3) reversing the DHEC Board's remand to determine the appropriate ultimate oxygen demand limits for certain months; and (4) concluding DHEC is not authorized to impose flow limits in NPDES permits.

Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald and Otis Benjamin Peeples, Jr.,of Charleston, for Appellant. William C. Cleveland, III, for Respondent.

Friends of McLeod, Inc. brought a claim against the Historic Charleston Foundation for failing to comply with the provisions of the Last Will of William E. McLeod by selling property known as the McLeod Plantation. The Friends of McLeod, Inc. appeal from the circuit court's order granting the Foundation's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(h), SCRCP, concluding it did not have subject matter jurisdiction because an action to construe a will must first be brought in the probate court, pursuant to section 62-1-302 of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2005).

Henry W. Brown and John W. Davidson, of Columbia, for Appellant. Joseph Kevin Qualey and Michael S. Seekings, of Charleston, for Respondents.

Questions whether the arbitrator's award was appropriately set aside on appeal to the master in equity.

Margaret M. Urbanic, of Charleston, for Appellant. David T. Pearlman, of Charleston, for Respondent. Cynthia B. Polk, of Columbia, for State Accident Fund.

Presents the question of whether a salary increase that went into effect a few weeks prior to an injury is an "exceptional" reason within the contemplation of the statute to recalculate the average weekly wage using the new figure, or should the normal method prevail.

Joseph Dawson, III, and Bernard E. Ferrara, Jr., of North Charleston, for Appellant. Melvin Richardson Hyman, Jr., of Charleston, for Respondents.

This appeal questions whether the master in equity correctly ruled that Charleston County did not obtain a right of way over certain property claimed by the respondents.

Joseph D. Thompson, III, and Lydia B. Applegate, of Charleston, for Appellant. Robert J. Wyndham and Donald Higgins Howe, of Charleston, for Respondent.

In this dispute between an employer and employee, Ligand appeals from the trial court's findings that it breached an employee contract, that it violated South Carolina's Payment of Wages Act, and that its policy regarding the payment of bonuses violated public policy.

Deena Smith McRackan, of Charleston, for Appellant. Deborah Kay Lewis, of Charleston Heights, for Respondent.

Wife appeals from the family court's order reducing Husband's alimony obligation from $750 to $300 and declining to require Husband to pay alimony via wage withholding.