Mark Davis Cauthen, of Columbia, for Appellants. Steve Wukela, Jr., of Florence, for Respondent.

In this workers' compensation action, Badger R. Bazen and Legion Insurance Company appeal the circuit court's decision affirming the decision of the Appellate Panel of the Workers' Compensation Commission's decision to award Glenn Bazen (Glenn) certain workers' compensation benefits. Specifically, Appellants maintain Glenn's average weekly wage calculation should not have included rental income when Glenn was living in a family home rent-free. Additionally, Appellants argue Glenn should not have been entitled to back temporary total disability, but Appellants should be entitled to a credit for the overpayment of benefits paid.

Robert J. Thomas, of Columbia, for Appellants. Barry L. Thompson, of West Columbia, for Respondents.

All Things Possible, Inc. and James H. Hampton appeal the circuit court's order finding they committed fraud in the inducement through the sale of a parcel of real estate.

Randall Scott Hiller, of Greenville, for Appellants. Stephen P. Hightower, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Paris Mountain Utilities, Inc., Joe W. Hiller, and David N. Hiller appeal an order of the Department of Health and Environmental Control assessing the Hillers individually for permit violations arising out of the actions of the company holding the permit. On appeal, Appellants assert that the Department lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the Hillers, and that the doctrine of offensive collateral estoppel should not have been applied prospectively to pierce the corporate veil and hold the Hillers responsible for the acts of the corporate entity.

Peter G. Oliver, of Lexington, for Appellant. Jeffrey Anderson, of Lexington, for Respondent.

Peter Oliver, pro se, appeals from the Administrative Law Court's (ALC) order affirming the Lexington County Assessor's (the Assessor's) valuation of his property located in Lexington, South Carolina (the Property). On appeal Oliver asserts the ALC erred in concluding the fair market value of the Property was $365,220 and that the Assessor's valuation of the Property prevented an equal and uniform assessment.

C. Rauch Wise, of Greenwood, for Appellant. Roy Hemphill, of Greenwood, for Respondent.

In this declaratory judgment action, Calhoun Falls Rescue Squad, Inc., appeals the circuit court's decision finding the County of Abbeville owned fifty percent of the Squad's newest ambulance and ordering the vehicle sold.

James Stevens, Jr., of Loris, for Appellant. William Edward Lawson, of Myrtle Beach, for Respondent.

Tracy Burnett appeals the trial court's decision granting The Family Kingdom's, d/b/a Family Kingdom Amusement Park, motion for a directed verdict in a negligence action. Burnett argues the trial court improperly held she failed to show the existence of a duty and failed to show The Family Kingdom was negligent in its actions.

Bradford N. Martin and Laura W.H. Teer, of Greenville, for Appellants-Respondents. Stephen L. Brown, Duke R. Highfield, and Russell G. Hines, of Charleston, for Respondent. J.J. Anderson and Eric M. Johnsen, of Charleston, for Respondent-Appellant.

This is a cross-appeal of a jury verdict in favor of Hiester Construction Company and Dilia & Odin Painting Company in an action brought by Kenneth E. and Bonnie L. Wright for damages arising from the destruction of their home as a result of a fire. In the primary appeal, the Wrights argue (1) the trial judge erred in excluding certain deposition testimony regarding the cause of the fire; (2) the trial judge abused his discretion in limiting their expert's testimony to his personal knowledge of the fire; (3) parole evidence should have been admitted regarding the parties' interpretation of certain contractual terms; (4) the trial should have been bifurcated; (5) the trial judge incorrectly informed the jury regarding trial procedure and the law; (6) evidence of insurance provisions under the contract between the Wrights and Hiester Construction Company should not have been admitted, (7) they were entitled to rulings in their favor on judicial estoppel and on the waiver of subrogation regarding Dilia & Odin, and (8) opposing counsel made an improper and prejudicial remark during closing argument. In its cross-appeal, Hiester Construction Company contends it was entitled to a directed verdict.

E. Leroy Nettles, Sr. and Marian D. Nettles, of Lake City, for Appellants. Gregory Askins, of Hemingway, and William M. O'Bryan, Jr., of Kingstree, for Respondents.

Toni Cooke Evans and David A. Nexsen (Appellants) appeal from the Special Referee's order awarding an easement to Toni M. Ward and J.W. Ward (Respondents), arguing the Special Referee erred in finding Respondents have an easement by express grant and an easement by necessity across Appellant Evans' land.

David B. Miller and Benjamin A. Baroody, of Myrtle Beach, for Appellant. William A. Bryan, of Surfside Beach, for Respondents.

Anderson Ocean Club Development, LLC, appeals the trial court's decision denying a motion to compel arbitration, arguing the trial court erred in concluding the dispute between the parties did not come within the scope of the arbitration clause.

J.R. Murphy and Ashley B. Stratton, of Columbia, for Appellant. Dennis James Rhoad, of Moncks Corner, for Respondents.

In this declaratory judgment action from Berkeley County, an insurer, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide), appeals the trial court's ruling that Respondent was entitled to underinsured motorist coverage (UIM) for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Nationwide argues the trial court erred in finding coverage because the South Carolina Supreme Court's opinion in Burgess v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 373 S.C. 37, 644 S.E.2d 40 (2007) compels a finding of no UIM coverage.

Ian Maguire, of Myrtle Beach, for Appellant. G. Michael Smith, of Conway, for Respondent.

Johnson's truck was hit head-on by a vehicle and then hit from the rear by Hunter's vehicle. The circuit court concluded these events constituted a single accident for purposes of Johnson's uninsured motorist coverage limiting recovery to a specific amount for "each accident." Johnson appeals.

Anita Ruth Floyd, of Conway, for Appellant-Respondent. Charles Richard Rhodes, Jr., of Surfside Beach, for Respondent-Appellant.

Both Husband and Wife appeal from the grant of a divorce on the ground of one year's continuous separation. Husband argues the family court erred in (1) failing to award him a divorce on the grounds of Wife's habitual drunkenness, (2) awarding Wife alimony, (3) apportioning the marital estate, and (4) awarding Wife attorney's fees. Wife contends the family court erred in its determination of marital property.