Larry G. Reddeck, of Nettles, Turbeville & Reddeck, of Lake City, for appellant. W.E. Jenkinson, III, and Jennifer R. Kellahan, both of Jenkinson & Jenkinson; and Ernest J. Jarrett, of Jenkinson & Jenkinson, all of Kingstree, for respondents.

Williamsburg Rural, a non-profit water and sewer company, challenges the City’s decision to award the Town of Kingstree the right to provide water and sewer services in an area that Williamsburg Rural claims it has the exclusive right to service.

M.M. Weinberg, Jr., and M.M. Weinberg, III, both of Weinberg, Brown & Curtis, of Sumter; and Michael P. Horger, of Horger & Horger, of Orangeburg, for appellant. A.F. Carter, III, and Cynthia Bailey Berry, both of Carter Law Firm, of Orangeburg, for respondents.

This case involves alleged error by the trial court in compelling arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement and whether appellant waived its right to enforce the contractual arbitration agreement.

Katherine Carruth Link, of Columbia, for appellant. Attorney General Charles M. Condon, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, all of Columbia; and Solicitor William Townes Jones, of Greenwood, for respondent.

This case deals with a passenger’s Fourth Amendment rights during a lawful traffic stop.

G. Richardson Wieters, of Hilton Head Island, for appellant. Frank H. Clabaugh, of Hilton Head Island, for respondent.

This case involves the interpretation of a verbal agreement in regard to a loan, alleged error by the court in creating a judicial version of the agreement, and alleged error in providing “back-up” conclusions of law.

Stephen L. Brown, Stephen P. Groves, Sr., Jonathan L. Yates and Bradish J. Waring, all of Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, of Charleston, for appellant. Samuel W. Howell, IV, of Charleston, for respondent.

This is a zoning action interpreting the Town's ordinance governing the permitting of telecommunications towers.

Katherine Carruth Link, of Columbia, for appellant. Attorney General Charles M. Condon, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson and Assistant Attorney General Melody J. Brown, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for respondent.

This criminal appeal alleges the trial court erred in admitting pre-trial photo identifications, in admitting redacted photos of the ones used during the identification procedure, and in requiring Appellant to choose between the redacted photos or the actual photos used during the identification procedure.

Darrell T. Johnson, Jr., of Hardeeville; and R. Thayer Rivers, Jr., of Ridgeland, for appellant. W. Hugh McAngus, of McAngus, Goudelock & Courie, of Columbia, for respondents..

This Workers’ Compensation case involves the “going and coming” rule, the furnishing of transportation by an employer to an employee, and whether appellant’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.

Ronald E. Boston and R. Hawthorne Barrett, both of Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney, of Columbia, for appellants. Mark W. Hardee, of Lewis, Babcock & Hawkins, of Columbia, for respondent.

This case involves the question of whether the trial court erred in failing to set aside a default judgment, and in entering an award for damages when the material evidence offered did not support the award and the damages awarded exceeded the amount requested.

Joseph Gregory Studemeyer, of Columbia, for appellant. Clyde A. Eltzroth, Jr., and John E. Parker, both of Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrick, of Hampton, for respondent.

In 1986, McMillan signed a membeship agreement to become a member of Gold Kist's cooperative association. The agreement, which did not have an arbitration clause, was subject to the then current provisions of the association's charter and by-laws as well as any provisions that would later be in effect. The issue on appeal is whether Gold Kist can compel McMillan to arbitrate claims it has against Gold Kist based on the arbitration policy Gold Kist adopted years after McMillan signed the membership agreement.

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of SC Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for appellant. Attorney General Charles M. Condon, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka and Senior Assistant Attorney General William Edgar Salter, III, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John R. Justice, of Chester, for respondent.

This criminal appeal alleges error in the trial judge’s charge to the jury in regard to reasonable doubt, instructing the jury on “failure of the defendant to testify,” and admitting an enlarged photograph of the victim.

G. Richardson Wieters, of Hilton Head Island, for appellants. Glen Winston La Force, Sr., of Hilton Head Island, for respondents.

The defendants appeal a jury verdict in this action for conversion of partnership property. The issues on appeal are (1) the enforceability of a forum selection clause, (2) the trial court’s failure to direct a verdict for the defendants, and (3) trial court’s refusal to charge wrongful interference with contractual relations and slander of title.

Timothy G. Quinn, of Columbia, for appellant. Stephen L. Brown, Edward D. Buckley, Jr., Donald J. Davis, Jr., and Stephen P. Groves, Sr., all of Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, of Charleston, for respondent.

In this action for breach of contract, tortious interference with contractual relations, violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act, and conspiracy, defendant American Bingo & Gaming Corp. appeals, alleging error in (1) the denial of its motion to amend its pleadings to conform to the evidence at trial, (2) the failure to direct a verdict on the cause of action of tortuous interference with contract, (3) the failure to allow for mitigation, and (4) the reliance on hearsay evidence.

Sally G. Calhoun, of Beaufort, for appellant. Attorney General Charles M. Condon, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson and Assistant Attorney General W. Rutledge Martin, all of Columbia; and Solicitor William Townes Jones, of Greenwood, for respondent.

This case involves whether the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for felony DUI.

Robert J. Harte, of Aiken; and Deborah R. J. Shupe, of Columbia, for appellant. Ronnie L. Crosby, of Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrick, of Hampton, for respondent.

The issue in this case is whether Appellant obtained title to real property by acquiescence of Respondent’s predecessors to a change in the boundary line between adjoining lots.

Daniel Ernest Peagler, of Columbia; and Lex A. Rogerson, Jr., of Lexington, for appellants. Robert Y. Knowlton and Roopal S. Ruparelia, both of Haynsworth, Sinkler, Boyd, of Columbia, for respondent.

This case involves the question of a whether a homeowner’s insurance policy was effectively cancelled before the loss occurred.

Deputy Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek and Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, all of SC Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for appellant. Attorney General Charles M. Condon, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman M. Rapoport, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for respondent.

In this criminal matter, the appellant appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine and unlawful possession of a pistol. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence, which allegedly was obtained as the result of an unlawful pat-down search of appellant, a passenger in a lawfully stopped vehicle.

Harold P. Threlkeld, of Anderson, for appellants. Francis T. Draine, of Columbia, for respondents.

Louise (Meredith) Tucker brought this action seeking a constructive or resulting trust against real property she had transferred to her former attorney. The special referee restored Tucker’s title to the property. L. Kerry Bailey and Gene Bailey, individually and d/b/a B & B Investments, who had purchased the property, appeal.