THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.� IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
Charles E. Avery Appellant.
William P. Keesley, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-103
Submitted February 1, 2006 � Filed February 17, 2006
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, Office of Appellate Defense, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM:� Charles E. Avery appeals the revocation of his probation.� Avery argues he had a justifiable explanation for violating his probation.� Therefore, he contends, the trial court abused its discretion by revoking his probation.� Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
HEARN, C.J., and ANDERSON and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.