THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.� IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Marques Demindis Davis, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County
�Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.� 2006-UP-155
Submitted March 1, 2006 � Filed March 15, 2006

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:� Marques Demindis Davis appeals convictions of Second Degree Burglary, Kidnapping, Assault and Battery with Intent to Commit Criminal Sexual Conduct in the First Degree, and Assault and Battery with Intent to Kill, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motions for a directed verdict because the State failed to produce evidence supporting the charged offenses.� After a thorough review of the record and counsel�s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Davis�s appeal and grant counsel�s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

BEATTY, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.